Legal Fox India empowers you with expert articles that break down matrimonial, civil, criminal, and corporate legal issues into simple, actionable steps.
IndiGo has approached the Delhi High Court seeking refund of over ₹900 crore allegedly paid as customs duty on re-import of aircraft parts sent abroad for repair and maintenance. The petition raises issues under Section 20 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the scope of exemptions for re-imported goods, with broader implications for airlines and the MRO ecosystem.
The Supreme Court has stayed the Kerala High Court’s finding that the disputed Munambam land is not Waqf property and directed all parties to maintain status quo. The interim relief prevents any change in the nature, possession, or title of the land while the Court examines the legal and evidentiary issues under the Waqf Act, 1995.
The Supreme Court granted divorce by mutual consent and appreciated a woman for voluntarily not seeking alimony, noting that such amicable settlements are rare today. The Court also ensured that the waiver was informed, voluntary, and free from coercion before closing all disputes.
The Delhi High Court has directed Google, Meta and X (formerly Twitter) to promptly act on former cricketer Sunil Gavaskar’s requests to take down fake and misleading online content misusing his name, photographs and identity, reinforcing personality rights protection in the digital space.
Jharkhand High Court: Legal Heir Not Liable for Deceased’s GST Dues Without Proof of Business Continuity Case: Rishi Shangari v. Union of India W.P.(T) No. 523 of 2023 — Judgment dated April 15, 2025 (Jharkhand High Court) The Jharkhand High Court recently set aside a demand order issued against a legal heir for recovery of GST dues belonging to his deceased father. The Court held that a son cannot be made liable for the tax liabilities of a deceased proprietor unless the department produces clear evidence that the legal heir continued the same business after the death of the original taxpayer. The ruling clarifies an important principle under Section 93(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, which places liability on a legal representative only when the same business is carried on after the death of the proprietor.